This will be a place to dream the ultimate IFS dream. That dream is bullet proof CV axles. Well, I just talked to RCV Performance today. They already make CV's for 4th and 5th gen runners and 2nd and 3rd Gen Tacos.
As most of you that wheel an IFS rig know stock CV's break. A lot. We've all gotten very good at swapping them out. I've done 5 this year. This got me thinking about after market options that are stronger then stock. One very well known company for 3rd gen runners is Lotus.
Lotus has re-designed and strengthened the outer tulip. They have left the inner tulip untouched. A set of there axles will run you $1200 bucks. They carry a one year warranty.
The problem I've always had with Lotus is the fact the inner joint is still stock. I have broken inners as have most of the guys I wheel with. That has steered me away from them and left me just replacing NAPA axles when I break them.
RCV is pretty much the heavyweight when it comes to CV axles. They are bomber. So bomber if fact all of there CV's carry a lifetime no questioned asked warranty. If you break one they replace it. You won't break one though. Cost will be in the neighborhood of $2000.
The whole axle is redesigned. Here's a small snippet about the architecture from RCV's site:
I've been waiting for RCV to get the 3rd Gen runner CV's to market. After I call with them today I was informed it's a go. They expect to have them available in a few weeks at most. So this leads to some discussion about having bomb proof CV's.
The logical question is what's the next weak link in the front drive train?
That also leads to the question of how much weaker are stock CV's then the rest of the drive train?
Is it possible to upgrade CV's and not have other things breaking instead of the CV's?
For a long time I was one of the guys saying to leave the stock CV's and just replace them. They are the weak link and they are easy to pull and replace. I'm reconsidering that position. I'm curious to hear others thoughts about it.
What do you guys think?
As most of you that wheel an IFS rig know stock CV's break. A lot. We've all gotten very good at swapping them out. I've done 5 this year. This got me thinking about after market options that are stronger then stock. One very well known company for 3rd gen runners is Lotus.
Lotus has re-designed and strengthened the outer tulip. They have left the inner tulip untouched. A set of there axles will run you $1200 bucks. They carry a one year warranty.
The problem I've always had with Lotus is the fact the inner joint is still stock. I have broken inners as have most of the guys I wheel with. That has steered me away from them and left me just replacing NAPA axles when I break them.
RCV is pretty much the heavyweight when it comes to CV axles. They are bomber. So bomber if fact all of there CV's carry a lifetime no questioned asked warranty. If you break one they replace it. You won't break one though. Cost will be in the neighborhood of $2000.
The whole axle is redesigned. Here's a small snippet about the architecture from RCV's site:
The axles feature a double-offset inboard CV joint that is comprised by 1-inch balls and 300M internal components. The outboard CVs utilize our Dana 60 architecture with combination of 4340 & 300M components optimized for maximum strength. The center bar is 35 spline 300M, the strongest in the industry. The RCV developed moly is used in the CVs to control heat build-up in even the most extreme use environments.
I've been waiting for RCV to get the 3rd Gen runner CV's to market. After I call with them today I was informed it's a go. They expect to have them available in a few weeks at most. So this leads to some discussion about having bomb proof CV's.
The logical question is what's the next weak link in the front drive train?
That also leads to the question of how much weaker are stock CV's then the rest of the drive train?
Is it possible to upgrade CV's and not have other things breaking instead of the CV's?
For a long time I was one of the guys saying to leave the stock CV's and just replace them. They are the weak link and they are easy to pull and replace. I'm reconsidering that position. I'm curious to hear others thoughts about it.
What do you guys think?