Inner fenders are for losers....
Ohh damn. Is there a motor cage in the works?View attachment 20686
Gotta cut some more first.
Yes. And a tube front fender/rad support.Ohh damn. Is there a motor cage in the works?
Yes. And a tube front fender/rad support.
No clue. Seems very arbitrary honestly.
Some seem like track width was the limiting factor and others seem like a specific travel number was the criteria
Can't really read anything on that sheet, but +2 is based on track width limited races
I've been telling people for years that +2s only make sense for 2 types of people, those that race their shit and people that run a lot of narrow technical crawling trails. For everyone else it's a waste of money.... Most people don't listen though. They don't have much more travel than a stock set up, sure as hell not enough to justify thousands of dollars to the casual offroader.That makes alot of sense, because from a performance perspective +2 is a definite looser, you can get almost as much from a +1, or shitload more from a +3.
I've been telling people for years that +2s only make sense for 2 types of people, those that race their shit and people that run a lot of narrow technical crawling trails. For everyone else it's a waste of money.... Most people don't listen though. They don't have much more travel than a stock set up, sure as hell not enough to justify thousands of dollars to the casual offroader.
Those sneakers look new....
Those sneakers look new....
Also fuck uniballs. Replaced a bad lower uniball and TRE on passenger side today. Again. 35s beat shit up
Truth. The Delta joints sucked as an alternativeThe only thing worse than a unibal is all the alternatives.