Oh I'm not saying IC doesn't matter, I'm just saying you should definitely factor in the camber curve as somewhat of a priority. Positive camber is no bueno, so definitely factor that as a priority in the equation. Having a decent amount of negative camber at bump and droop will help handling in corners, especially if your RC ends up lower. Helps keep the outer wheel from going crazy positive camber.IC drives RC, holding CG and tires constant, so it does matter.
I'm moving the UCA mount, probably to the top/outer corner of the frame rail.
I'm flattening the UCA pivot axis to remove the caster change, and will live with the camber change I get. It won't be as much as stock, but there with a 15" LCA and 10" UCA I'll still get enough.
Bump steer: I'm building a spindle so I'll put the steering pickup where I need it, and the tundra rack means that really has to be custom anyway.
Okay I see what's going on here. The circles for the spindle had me way the fuck confused lol. Is it not easier to just draw a line connecting the pivots? That way you can easily measure the camber change.
Oh I'm not saying IC doesn't matter, I'm just saying you should definitely factor in the camber curve as somewhat of a priority. Positive camber is no bueno, so definitely factor that as a priority in the equation. Having a decent amount of negative camber at bump and droop will help handling in corners, especially if your RC ends up lower. Helps keep the outer wheel from going crazy positive camber.
Then you'll want to try to get a decent SAI so you aren't getting a ton of scrub radius and extra wear on your steering. Also helps with steering centering and stability.
Luckily caster curve won't be an factor for you.
Roll center can be dealt with via a sway bar if it's way low, and if it's too high you'll get jacking in corners which can't really be dealt with, without changing geometry. Do you have a target location for the RC at ride height? Remember this location can change quite a bit with ride height.
second pic looks good but needs more colors like the first.
Are you sure the J arm is going to be ridged enough not to flex front to rear?
CAD/CAM = Cardboard Aided Design/ManufacturingLets see if the new spindle will fit in the wheel, it's going to be close for sure, and I might have to use a wheel spacer, and deal with the front track being a little wider than the back.
Going by how everyone seems to build arms the lower uniball will be mounted on the LCA, so the spindle just gets mounting tabs. the upper will mount on the spindle, and the arm gets tabs. I'm not sure there's any good reason for this though, it's tempting to build both uniballs into the arms and put the mounting tabs on the spindle.
CAD/CAM = Cardboard Aided Design/Manufacturing
My faveSometimes still the easiest way to prototype.
You're not supposed to use a plasma cutter on it.My cardboard always catches on fire.
Spindle fits with a spacer, so it looks like I'm gaining 1.5" per side of track width, but there doesn't appear to be a good set of arm lengths that will work with a spindle which fits inside the wheel.
NICE! Have you measured your scrub radius with the spacer and that spindle?Spindle fits with a spacer, so it looks like I'm gaining 1.5" per side of track width, but there doesn't appear to be a good set of arm lengths that will work with a spindle which fits inside the wheel.
NICE! Have you measured your scrub radius with the spacer and that spindle?