Fuck turning wrenches, I wanna go wheeling; So I sold the taco.

AssBurns

will wheel for beer
Staff member
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
7,959
Age
31
Location
Yucaipa, CA
I have no idea what I am looking at in that image lol

Now, does the instant center matter that much when you can focus on other things, such as SAI, camber change, and bump steer while using stock steering rack (if that's what you keep).
You don't plan to keep stock upper mounts, right? That free's up a lot of room to play with spindle design, and pivot locations to get the IC/RC you are looking for.
 

Arcticelf

Head BFH Operator at Gray Man Fab
Joined
Apr 23, 2019
Messages
1,167
Location
DelCo PA
IC drives RC, holding CG and tires constant, so it does matter.

I'm moving the UCA mount, probably to the top/outer corner of the frame rail.

I'm flattening the UCA pivot axis to remove the caster change, and will live with the camber change I get. It won't be as much as stock, but there with a 15" LCA and 10" UCA I'll still get enough.

Bump steer: I'm building a spindle so I'll put the steering pickup where I need it, and the tundra rack means that really has to be custom anyway.
 

Arcticelf

Head BFH Operator at Gray Man Fab
Joined
Apr 23, 2019
Messages
1,167
Location
DelCo PA
Suspension-notes.jpg
Now with labels on things.

The frame reference points are so I can mirror this and see both sides. When I make the mirror copy those lines match up on both versions and it's properly aligned.

The spindle is shown as a circle because its the easiest way to draw the two intersection points, which is what I care about. I'll have to model up the actual spindle later.
 

AssBurns

will wheel for beer
Staff member
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
7,959
Age
31
Location
Yucaipa, CA
Okay I see what's going on here. The circles for the spindle had me way the fuck confused lol. Is it not easier to just draw a line connecting the pivots? That way you can easily measure the camber change.

IC drives RC, holding CG and tires constant, so it does matter.

I'm moving the UCA mount, probably to the top/outer corner of the frame rail.

I'm flattening the UCA pivot axis to remove the caster change, and will live with the camber change I get. It won't be as much as stock, but there with a 15" LCA and 10" UCA I'll still get enough.

Bump steer: I'm building a spindle so I'll put the steering pickup where I need it, and the tundra rack means that really has to be custom anyway.
Oh I'm not saying IC doesn't matter, I'm just saying you should definitely factor in the camber curve as somewhat of a priority. Positive camber is no bueno, so definitely factor that as a priority in the equation. Having a decent amount of negative camber at bump and droop will help handling in corners, especially if your RC ends up lower. Helps keep the outer wheel from going crazy positive camber.
Then you'll want to try to get a decent SAI so you aren't getting a ton of scrub radius and extra wear on your steering. Also helps with steering centering and stability.
Luckily caster curve won't be an factor for you.
Roll center can be dealt with via a sway bar if it's way low, and if it's too high you'll get jacking in corners which can't really be dealt with, without changing geometry. Do you have a target location for the RC at ride height? Remember this location can change quite a bit with ride height.
 

Arcticelf

Head BFH Operator at Gray Man Fab
Joined
Apr 23, 2019
Messages
1,167
Location
DelCo PA
Okay I see what's going on here. The circles for the spindle had me way the fuck confused lol. Is it not easier to just draw a line connecting the pivots? That way you can easily measure the camber change.

From the perspective of making the drafting easy, the circle method works really well. I've have to go back and measure the intersection points to compute the camber curve, for both OEM and proposed new. That's today's project.

Oh I'm not saying IC doesn't matter, I'm just saying you should definitely factor in the camber curve as somewhat of a priority. Positive camber is no bueno, so definitely factor that as a priority in the equation. Having a decent amount of negative camber at bump and droop will help handling in corners, especially if your RC ends up lower. Helps keep the outer wheel from going crazy positive camber.
Then you'll want to try to get a decent SAI so you aren't getting a ton of scrub radius and extra wear on your steering. Also helps with steering centering and stability.
Luckily caster curve won't be an factor for you.
Roll center can be dealt with via a sway bar if it's way low, and if it's too high you'll get jacking in corners which can't really be dealt with, without changing geometry. Do you have a target location for the RC at ride height? Remember this location can change quite a bit with ride height.

I'm trying to keep the RC similar to OEM with a 2" lift, since I know that's a reasonable handling solution. That's why I'm focused on the IC math.

SAI I'm going to have to confirm.
 

Arcticelf

Head BFH Operator at Gray Man Fab
Joined
Apr 23, 2019
Messages
1,167
Location
DelCo PA
Suspenion_20200529.jpg
Not a bad set of camber curves. Not as extreme as OEM at full bump, but very similar in the main ride-height range.
 

Arcticelf

Head BFH Operator at Gray Man Fab
Joined
Apr 23, 2019
Messages
1,167
Location
DelCo PA
second pic looks good but needs more colors like the first.

Are you sure the J arm is going to be ridged enough not to flex front to rear?

I'm going to attach them right to the corner of the frame, one more or less where the front of the existing coil bucket attaches, and the second forward of that.

That should result in less flex than the OEM UCA attachment.

I need to do the math for how far, I'd like to get .05 degrees of camber/caster adjustment per turn on the uniball.
 

Arcticelf

Head BFH Operator at Gray Man Fab
Joined
Apr 23, 2019
Messages
1,167
Location
DelCo PA
Lets see if the new spindle will fit in the wheel, it's going to be close for sure, and I might have to use a wheel spacer, and deal with the front track being a little wider than the back.

Going by how everyone seems to build arms the lower uniball will be mounted on the LCA, so the spindle just gets mounting tabs. the upper will mount on the spindle, and the arm gets tabs. I'm not sure there's any good reason for this though, it's tempting to build both uniballs into the arms and put the mounting tabs on the spindle.
 

Chris In Milwaukee

Ain’t no mo’
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Messages
3,115
Age
56
Location
North Woods, WI USA
Lets see if the new spindle will fit in the wheel, it's going to be close for sure, and I might have to use a wheel spacer, and deal with the front track being a little wider than the back.

Going by how everyone seems to build arms the lower uniball will be mounted on the LCA, so the spindle just gets mounting tabs. the upper will mount on the spindle, and the arm gets tabs. I'm not sure there's any good reason for this though, it's tempting to build both uniballs into the arms and put the mounting tabs on the spindle.
CAD/CAM = Cardboard Aided Design/Manufacturing
 

AssBurns

will wheel for beer
Staff member
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
7,959
Age
31
Location
Yucaipa, CA
Spindle fits with a spacer, so it looks like I'm gaining 1.5" per side of track width, but there doesn't appear to be a good set of arm lengths that will work with a spindle which fits inside the wheel.
NICE! Have you measured your scrub radius with the spacer and that spindle?
 
Top Bottom