Bigbarlo
Curmudgeon
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2019
- Messages
- 1,044
- Age
- 55
Thanks.
Thanks.
Fuck 145 on Amazon? That's hard to say no to for sure. I might have to give them a whirl.
Look pretty decent in the rocks unless the guy and chick have amazing throttle control. I'm looking but cant find any in the 35 with a 17 tho. I barely looked for 15min on Amazon thoThey gotta be better on the road then Pitbulls and they are a shit ton cheaper. I wonder how they do in the rocks?
Look pretty decent in the rocks unless the guy and chick have amazing throttle control. I'm looking but cant find any in the 35 with a 17 tho. I barely looked for 15min on Amazon tho
Shows they have 9 in stock. I have 5 in the cart. Just thinking on it. But for 850 shipped it hard to say no.I'm happy so far, Amazon stock is spotty thought.
Your UPS driver will hate you.Shows they have 9 in stock. I have 5 in the cart. Just thinking on it. But for 850 shipped it hard to say no.
I will just order them to work. No biggie. Or at home he can just back up and roll them into the garage . I'm usually around to help. And idgafYour UPS driver will hate you.
I ordered 8...
Do the Milestar Patagonia M/T tires run true to "calculated" size?
So a skinny'ish 33" (285/70r17) would be 32.7" x 11.2" (go ahead, let the bashing begin... snowflake I ain't)
We all know that different manufacturers produce tires that can all over the spectrum compared to calculated dimensions. Which as long as you are trying to stay close to stock isn't too much of an issue. But when you are increasing the tire dimension away from OEM it can be problematic and I suspect is one of the main reasons that it is so common to field questions around rubbing - from mall crawlers and wheelers alike.
Background: I picked up a second hand set of OEM rims (2014 FJ, not chrome @eimkeith) to put onto my truck and they came with the existing tires. They are technically larger than my stock so I figured what the hell put them on and see how they'd work. But the physical dimensions are WAY less than the stock even they they are a larger tire - they look ridiculous.
That got me thinking I needed to ask all of you Patagonia M/T owners this question as this is my lead contender in new tires.
Gracias!I’ll measure my 315s for you tomorrow
Gracias!
Thanks do they also look to be about 12.5” in width, because that seems pretty spot on in diameter.I got 34-5/8”.
crap - I'll get that tomorrowThanks do they also look to be about 12.5” in width, because that seems pretty spot on in diameter.
LOLcrap - I'll get that tomorrow
Thanks do they also look to be about 12.5” in width, because that seems pretty spot on in diameter.
crap - I'll get that tomorrow
Guys, I think this is what is called "growth" or something.I'd kill to find a decent tire in 35x11.5x17. My PBR's are are very true 12.5 and they rub my frame just slightly at full lock and stuff. Hell, if I could find a 37x11x17 I'd make the jump tomorrow. I'd have to throw on a 1/2" body lift. Yep, @eimkeith , I just said body lift. lol
Do the Milestar Patagonia M/T tires run true to "calculated" size?
So a skinny'ish 33" (285/70r17) would be 32.7" x 11.2" (go ahead, let the bashing begin... snowflake I ain't)
We all know that different manufacturers produce tires that can all over the spectrum compared to calculated dimensions. Which as long as you are trying to stay close to stock isn't too much of an issue. But when you are increasing the tire dimension away from OEM it can be problematic and I suspect is one of the main reasons that it is so common to field questions around rubbing - from mall crawlers and wheelers alike.
...I needed to ask all of you Patagonia M/T owners this question as this is my lead contender in new tires.