Probably depends on how you define "worth it". I look at a lot of people on instagram and I can't understand what is going through their heads, they drop thousands upon thousands of dollars on offroad/overland crap and only use it 2 or 3 times a year. I think those people get caught up in the offroad-big-dick-contest without taking a step back and looking at how much they will actually use what they are buying.
I would still get a +2 kit for just 2 reasons:
1. With a +3.5 kit I wouldn't feel OK around police without fiberglass fenders, my issue with glass fenders is a couple times I year I end up on grossly overgrown tracks with large branches or limbs in the way, I don't know if I would trust fiberglass fenders to hold up to plowing through the undergrowth without getting damaged.
2. On some of the trails we drive on track width can be a seriously liability. Dusy-Ershim, Odessa-Doran, and Elephant Hill Loop would be interesting for a 2nd gen with a +3.5 kit. There aren't a lot of trails where its a serious issue, but they are definitely around and the list isn't limited to those 3. You saw what happened on Dusy between the rock and the tree, there were multiple other places where I had tire sidewalls on both sides of the truck rubbing at the same time.
3. I plan on using the kit on my 2nd gen and 3rd gen.
Number 1 might just be my own personal hang up about fiberglass fenders....they might be perfectly fine getting smashed on limbs, but I don't want to find out first hand that they don't. I think anyone that has a +2 kit and doesn't actually go on track width limited trails is a fucking retard, they should have got a +3.5......or just stayed stock if they don't use their junk much.
Looking at it from a monetary point of view to get a basic TC +2 set up, its fucking expensive.
$3000 - +2 standard kit
$620ish - Extended travel CV axles (quantity 2)
$1520ish - coilovers
That's over $5000 for their shittiest basic set up that's stronger, gets a couple extra inches of travel, and has a tiny bit more stability over stock....How some of these people rationalize that with the little use they get out of it is beyond me. I flat out recommended Kyle and Mike just stay stock width since they already had upgraded LCAs, the little bit of extra travel and stability isn't worth the up front or long term costs.